期刊詳細資料 Journal detailed information
作者(Author)	曾明遜、林蕙玲
篇名(Article title)	預售屋買賣定型化契約應記載及不得記載事項之權利保障方式分析
期刊名(Journal name)	公平交易季刊
國際期刊(International Journal)	TSSCI
中文摘要(Abstrct)	在預售屋交易發生權利義務爭執而訴諸法院時，「預售屋買賣定型化契約應記載及不得記載事項」之權利保障方式與舉證責任分配規定，關係著訴訟雙方的權利保障程度，而成為勝敗訴的關鍵。相關研究大都將權利保障方式與舉證責任分配分別處理：在權利保障方式課題的探討，主要集中在財產法則或補償法則何種保障方式相對較有效率的論述；在舉證責任分配課題的探討，則主要集中在由己方或他方負責舉證相對較符合學說或較低舉證成本的論述。為了更完整細緻探討何種權利保障方式相對較能降低交易成本，促使交易參與者往最適化邁進，本文將舉證責任分配納入權利保障方式框架，建構四項權利保障方式規則。在此框架下，本文利用法律經濟分析方式，以應記載事項第5點及第19點為例，比較分析此四項權利保障方式規則之交易成本。分析推導結果，由賣方負責舉證責任之財產法則保障方式，相對於其他三種規則較有誘因縮減交易成本。因此本文認為現行應記載事項第5點及第19點，由買方負舉證責任之財產法則保障方式規則，宜調整為由賣方負舉證責任之財產法則權利保障方式。若欲維持現行方案，則宜調降買方證明度標準或透過不同訴訟進程賦予不同證據提出責任，以改善現行方案相對較高交易成本的課題。
ABSTRCT	Scholars have examined the propriety of rules used to protect legal entitlements, focusing on the question whether property or liability rules result in more efficient outcome. The burdens of proof allocation often will be important in determining the optimal rule. In order to seek more effective the rule for protecting legal entitlements, this paper constructs four-rule schema to discuss which rule can reduce transaction costs and thus promote optimal exchange, by taking burdens of proof allocation into the entitlement framework. Furthermore, this paper adopts an approach based on law and economics to comparative analysis the transaction costs of the 5th and the 19th items that should be printed on the standard-form contracts for pre-sales housing with the four rules. This paper shows that the property rule with allocating burdens of proof to seller will produce more efficient incentives for minimizing the transaction costs than the others rules in the 5th and the 19th items.
中文關鍵字(Keyword)	預售屋買賣定型化契約應記載及不得記載事項、財產法則、補償法則、舉證責任、交易成本、法律經濟
KEYWORD	Mandatory and Prohibitory Provisions to be Included in Standard-Form Contracts for Pre-Sales Housing, Property Rules, Liability Rules, Burdens of Proof, Transaction Costs, Law and Economics.
卷期(Volume No)	第17卷 第4期
頁數(Page number)	第141~181頁
年份(Year)	2009
語言(Language)	中文 Chinese