期刊詳細資料 Journal detailed information  
作者(Author)袁光儀
篇名(Article title)卓吾李先生,今之子瞻也——李贄與蘇軾並論之意義探討
期刊名(Journal name)北京科技大學學報.社會科學版
國際期刊(International Journal)
中文摘要(Abstrct)袁中道嘗譽李贄為「今之子瞻」,李贄與蘇軾二人並論之基礎及其意義何在實有值得探討之處。蘇軾備受晚明文人推崇,而李贄正是當中彰揚蘇軾之第一人。研究之初首先引證李贄對蘇軾之推重,其次討論李贄在晚明蘇學盛行之風潮中的代表性地位。晚明文人與道學家對立之意識,可上溯至北宋之洛蜀黨爭,故李贄被視為「反道學」之文人,實亦承繼蘇軾蜀學與洛學對立之精神。然李贄學術乃陽明嫡傳,而陽明心學儘管與程朱理學相頡頏,卻無疑仍屬道學一脈,以性命之學為依歸。由此進一步考察李贄之「反道學」,僅在反程朱之一尊;而其表彰蘇軾,亦正代表了陽明心學涵融洛、蜀之精神,今日重新正視李贄與蘇軾之學術,對儒學之過去與未來亦將有更開闊之思考。
ABSTRCTYuan Zhong Dao acclaimed Li Zhi as the Modern version of Zi Zhan, thus the basis and the signification of putting Li Zhi and Su Shi on a par is worth further probing. Su Shi was highly valued by the late Ming Dynasty scholar, especially by Li Zhi. This research will first certified the high regard for Su Shi from Li Zhi, proceeded with the discussion regarding Li Zhi’s representative status in Su Studies during the prevalent period of late Ming Dynasty. The antagonism between late Ming Dynasty scholars and Moralism can be traced back to the Luo Shu party dispute of Northern Song Dynasty, in fact Li Zhi was treated as the “anti-moralism”, actually inherited Su Shi’s spirit above the inverse of Shu Studies and Luo Studies. However, Li Zhi’s learning was handed down in a direct line from Yang Ming, although Yang Ming’s Xin studies were against Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism, there is no doubt that both of them belongs to same lineage of Moralism and sees “the study of human nature and destiny” as their basis. Moreover, Li Zhi’s “anti-moralism” only reflects in anti-Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism but the compliment he showed for Su Shi stated the combination of Yang Ming’s Xin Studies with Luo Shu’s spirit. The reinterpretation regarding the studies between Li Zhi and Su Shi will broaden the visual of Confucianism.
中文關鍵字(Keyword)李贄、蘇軾、陽明心學、晚明文人、洛蜀黨爭
KEYWORDLi Zhi, Su Shi, Yang Ming’s Xin studies, Literati in the late Ming Dynasty, Luo Shu party dispute
卷期(Volume No)第28卷 第4期
頁數(Page number)第22~30頁
年份(Year)2012
語言(Language)中文 Chinese